SIO56: Who Speaks for the Atheist Movement?

This podcast is an audio version, with some elaborations, of my first ever blog post, entitled “Whoever I Don’t Like Is Ruining The Atheist Movement.” Definitely check out and share the blog version! It has screenshots and links and stuff.

Leave Thomas a voicemail! (916) 750-4746, remember short and to the point!

Support us on Patreon at:

Follow us on Twitter: @seriouspod


For comments, email


Direct Download

Leave a Reply

8 Comments on "SIO56: Who Speaks for the Atheist Movement?"

newest oldest most voted
Notify of
St. Ralph
There’s an Anti-PC movement? I had no idea. Where do I sign up? If our asses can be saved, it will be non-Republican, pro-left anti-PC people who do it. Those and the so-called Deep State will be the ones to pull us out of the quicksand, if it can be done. The regressive left and the alt-right are standing in the middle of the swamp flinging fistfuls of goop at each other and at everyone else, even those you would have thought were on their respective sides—while we all continue to sink. Embrace the Void, y’all! (It’s closer than you… Read more »

I agreed entirely with your sentiments, and will read that blog and maybe share it when I have fb again.
It was a bit strange hearing you read your writing on air, trying to keep in mind who was talking, you-reading-you, or you-reading-you-quoting. you-aside is easy though.

I’m gonna re-send a voicemail on whitesplaining where I get to the point quicker.


when I want to avoid white guys like Dawkins, krauss, Harris and boghossian talking about what is reasonable, the first place I turn is Thomas, Eli, Noah, Heath, Tom, and Cecil

Vladimir Krasny

Whats Lawrance’s stance on PC? I thought he was always more left leaning, somewhat like Matt D. is?


The episode thumbnail pic is straw man. This was never the problem and the points don’t even contradict.

I haven’t read either your post or Smalley’s, but I couldn’t help but notice Smalley apparently uses that damn horseshoe theory. Even though the anti-PC crowd is apparently against the soft sciences, it sure doesn’t stop them from making stuff up about them. Because that’s what the horsehoe theory is: nothing but crap. It isn’t part of political science. It is a theory in only the colloquial sense, and not the academic sense. It’s the Golden Mean fallacy under a new name and nothing more. Now that I’m done beating a dead horseshoe, I’m reminded of back when Elevatorgate went… Read more »
Derek Dadey

I liked this episode and agreed with most of what you had to say, particularly the black/blue lives matter bit. It was a little stilted sounding listening to you read on air but nothing to distracting. My own theory on the drop in conference attendance is that the field used to bee dominated by one or to mega-conferences per year (ie the amazing meeting) but now it seems like every small town or organization is throwing their own little conference thus diluting the overall pool .

Ed L
Good podcast and blog post. I very much appreciate your approach to these matters, and it has been very rewarding to see your own evolution on political and philosophical matters. (You leaned pretty heavily libertarian in your early days, but – as is the case when people honestly investigate the issues – seem to have moved toward a more traditional liberal viewpoint of late. I’m one of those atheists not attending conferences or having much interest in the movement. This is a shift, as I was getting more involved in the movement right about the time Elevatorgate exposed the right-libertarian… Read more »