SIO5: Fake News Epidemic

Today I’m talking with Dr. Joel Breakstone, director of the Stanford History Education Group. He was co-director of a recent study that looked at thousands of students, from middle school through college, and tested their ability to discern fake news from real news. The results are worrying, and may give us some insight into why this is such a problem in America today.

Then I take a few minutes to talk to Bruce Gleason, Director of LogiCal LA about their upcoming conference. 

Find the Executive Summary of the Stanford University research study here

And an article discussing the study here

Learn more about LogiCal LA and get tickets to the upcoming event here

Support us on Patreon at:

Follow us on Twitter: @seriouspod


For comments, email

Questions, Suggestions, Episode ideas? Contact us:

Direct Download

Direct Download

Leave a Reply

2 Comment threads
1 Thread replies
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
3 Comment authors
Some GuyMoe PerrySt. Ralph Recent comment authors

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

newest oldest most voted
Notify of
St. Ralph

This is REALLY interesting. There really need to be courses—required ones—for training kids from junior high on up how to be savvy consumers of everything, including news. We were actually taught those things when I was a kid (in the Before Time). I don’t remember what class it was in conjunction with, but they would teach us to discriminate between subjective claims and verifiable claims. Like a 25″ Zenith TV with “the clearest picture in the industry.” You could take a measuring tape to the store and see if it was really 25″ diagonally (and how much of that was… Read more »

Moe Perry
Moe Perry

Nice episode.
I’m thinking that some of the poor results might be because of the trust students place in the experimenters, milgram experiment etc. Could be just deluding myself though since it’s pretty depressing on the face of it.

Some Guy
Some Guy

I’m not sure if it’ll help or hurt with the depression, but recently there’s been a lot of criticism about the claims made by Milgram and Zimbardo, (which is kind of fitting, as far as fake news is the topic of the episode). Aside from the flagrant ethical violations, it seems like a lot of the criticism of Milgram’s experiments focus on what he inferred from the testing data not being necessarily supported by it, which iterations of the test he chose to omit, and to what extent his researcher was allowed to go off-script during the experiment. I’ve seen… Read more »