SIO21: Be Reasonable, with Michael Marshall

Joining me today is Michael Marshall, host of the podcast Be Reasonable.  On his show, Marsh speaks with people who have incredibly fringe views.  Whether it’s a ghost hunter or flat Earther, Be Reasonable allows a place for these folks to speak at length on their views. Marsh messaged me after my interview with Trump supporter Dr. Price because of the similarity in that recording to what Marsh is doing on his show. In this interview, Marsh and I have a dialogue about what tactics he uses when speaking to people of vastly different views, and I pick his brain on a number of issues involved. There’s a lot to learn here about how I want to conduct interviews in the future when I’m dealing with someone of vastly different views.

Check out Marsh’s charity goodthinkingsociety.org

Leave us a Voicemail: (916) 750-4746!

Support us on Patreon at:  patreon.com/seriouspod

Follow us on Twitter: @seriouspod

Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/seriouspod

For comments, email thomas@seriouspod.com

Questions, Suggestions, Episode ideas? email: haeley@seriouspod.com

 

Direct Download

Leave a Reply

4 Comments on "SIO21: Be Reasonable, with Michael Marshall"

Notify of
avatar
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Dan
Guest
Few comments on this episode. Marsh is awesome, I enjoy both his shows. The conversation you had was really good. Now some issues: 1. Stop saying you don’t want to talk about Milo and then bring him up, I’ll steal a GAM line, “You’re the podcast(er)” There are a million people you can use as an example. 2. Please avoid strawmen and labels. Try to use actual examples, do not just say the buzzwords. Tommy Robinson is a racist is not an argument. Tommy Robinson said XYZ, and we can decide if he is a racist based on those things… Read more »
Jeremiah Traeger
Guest

That is not an exhaustive list. It could be the case that even if one side has bad ideas and bad arguments to support them, they still resonate with people watching and the person builds a following regardless. People are not perfect logic machines, and they become compelled by bad arguments, bad logic, and bad thinking all the time.

We can’t pretend that using good arguments based on good evidence and good logic will automatically win people over, and I’m pretty sure there’s a lot of psychological evidence that shows that this isn’t the case.

St. Ralph
Guest

“We can’t pretend that using good arguments based on good evidence and good logic will automatically win people over, . . .”

In fact, it’s getting more and more so that you can pretty much assume that that’s not the case. You need an argument that’s going to hit them in the gut and resonate there, because nowadays if it doesn’t ring there, it doesn’t ring. The words almost never even make it to their heads anymore.

Andy Ward
Guest
Hello, I enjoyed this podcast very much and think it has a lot more useful content than many I’ve heard about how to engage people on “the other side”. I’d just like to correct one thing Marsh said which was that Farage became an MEP because of low Euro election turnout. That’s not actually the reason. The reason is that the Euro elections use a PR system and each party is allocated a number of seats based on their vote %. It’s then up to the party which individuals become those MEPs. The way UKIP do that is the party… Read more »